<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Race Relations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.racerelations.ws/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.racerelations.ws</link>
	<description>Racial Profiling: Thoughts On Race And Racism In America, And Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:05:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hotel Rwanda: A depiction of all that is wrong with too many blacks by Phillip</title>
		<link>http://www.racerelations.ws/?p=26&#038;cpage=1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialperspectives.com/?p=26#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Interesting point, although I suspect that if you ask the average black person of that day whether or not it was better to work in the house, or in the fields, they&#039;d have probably said the house.
Of course, the perspective may have been different for the house slaves---particularly the women.

Suffice it to say that all people of negroid ancestry in America had their crosses and burdens to bear, whether light or dark.

Great point, though.  I never even thought about that perspective.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point, although I suspect that if you ask the average black person of that day whether or not it was better to work in the house, or in the fields, they&#8217;d have probably said the house.<br />
Of course, the perspective may have been different for the house slaves&#8212;particularly the women.</p>
<p>Suffice it to say that all people of negroid ancestry in America had their crosses and burdens to bear, whether light or dark.</p>
<p>Great point, though.  I never even thought about that perspective.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hotel Rwanda: A depiction of all that is wrong with too many blacks by AP</title>
		<link>http://www.racerelations.ws/?p=26&#038;cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialperspectives.com/?p=26#comment-4</guid>
		<description>.

Since mention was made of the topic of 
‘house and ‘field’ slave — I just wanted 
to note that — actually — this false 
concept that so many people have — that 
the lighter-complexioned chattel slaves
“had it easier” or “thought they were
better” than the darker-complexioned slaves
– and / or “relaxed in the big house” while
the darker-complexioned slaves “suffered in
the fields” — is very much like the infamous
‘Willie Lynch Letter’ Hoax) all VERY MUCH AN
URBAN MYTH (and is one which, in nearly every
way that’s possible, completely defies
the true historical recorded account).

The historical record shows that
those enslaved people who were of a
lighter-complexion (i.e. mulatto-lineage)
and that were found on the continental
United States during the antebellum
(chattel slavery) era were actually treated
MUCH, MUCH WORSE than were those enslaved
people who were of a darker-complexion.

In fact, record shows that most of the White
people (specially the White women) tended to
look upon the lighter-complexioned slaves
as being mere ‘mongrels of miscegenation’
(resulting largely from the rapes caused
by overseers); in their disgust at the sight
of these slaves — insisted that they be
“banished to the fields”; and also then
purposefully reserved most of the ‘big
house’ positions (ex. mammy, cook, driver,
etc) for the darker-complexioned slaves —
who most of the White people perceived as
being “more loyal, docile, less competitive”
– and, equally important, of a skin tone
which could never cause them to be mistaken
for ‘white’ or a possible member of
the plantation owners’ own family.

And this maltreatment was generally
even much more so the case if the
lighter-complexioned enslaved person
was ’suspected’ (by a wife, sister or
daughter — who ran “the big house”,
while a ‘male’ family member ran “the
plantation”) of possibly being the
offspring of a plantation owner
(or his son, father or brother).

In addition, the few lighter-complexioned
enslaved people that were actually permitted
to do any work within the house were – as
punishment for having the lowly status of
“mongrel” and in order to make sure they
did not become “too uppity” — kept under
much more severe supervision (by both the
White women who ran the plantation household
and also by the darker-complexioned enslaved
people) and under much more severe work
detail than were most of the (more trusted)
darker-complexioned enslaved people.

Books by Deborah Gray White; Paula Giddings;
J. California Cooper; bell hooks’, etc.
expose the truth about the urban-myth and
show that the lighter slaves received NO
special treatment and were (as mere “mongrels
of miscegenation”) usually treated much
worse than were darker-complexioned slaves.

Hope this information is helpful
&amp; that everyone has a great day. 

– AP (soaptalk@hotmail.com)

&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p>Since mention was made of the topic of<br />
‘house and ‘field’ slave — I just wanted<br />
to note that — actually — this false<br />
concept that so many people have — that<br />
the lighter-complexioned chattel slaves<br />
“had it easier” or “thought they were<br />
better” than the darker-complexioned slaves<br />
– and / or “relaxed in the big house” while<br />
the darker-complexioned slaves “suffered in<br />
the fields” — is very much like the infamous<br />
‘Willie Lynch Letter’ Hoax) all VERY MUCH AN<br />
URBAN MYTH (and is one which, in nearly every<br />
way that’s possible, completely defies<br />
the true historical recorded account).</p>
<p>The historical record shows that<br />
those enslaved people who were of a<br />
lighter-complexion (i.e. mulatto-lineage)<br />
and that were found on the continental<br />
United States during the antebellum<br />
(chattel slavery) era were actually treated<br />
MUCH, MUCH WORSE than were those enslaved<br />
people who were of a darker-complexion.</p>
<p>In fact, record shows that most of the White<br />
people (specially the White women) tended to<br />
look upon the lighter-complexioned slaves<br />
as being mere ‘mongrels of miscegenation’<br />
(resulting largely from the rapes caused<br />
by overseers); in their disgust at the sight<br />
of these slaves — insisted that they be<br />
“banished to the fields”; and also then<br />
purposefully reserved most of the ‘big<br />
house’ positions (ex. mammy, cook, driver,<br />
etc) for the darker-complexioned slaves —<br />
who most of the White people perceived as<br />
being “more loyal, docile, less competitive”<br />
– and, equally important, of a skin tone<br />
which could never cause them to be mistaken<br />
for ‘white’ or a possible member of<br />
the plantation owners’ own family.</p>
<p>And this maltreatment was generally<br />
even much more so the case if the<br />
lighter-complexioned enslaved person<br />
was ’suspected’ (by a wife, sister or<br />
daughter — who ran “the big house”,<br />
while a ‘male’ family member ran “the<br />
plantation”) of possibly being the<br />
offspring of a plantation owner<br />
(or his son, father or brother).</p>
<p>In addition, the few lighter-complexioned<br />
enslaved people that were actually permitted<br />
to do any work within the house were – as<br />
punishment for having the lowly status of<br />
“mongrel” and in order to make sure they<br />
did not become “too uppity” — kept under<br />
much more severe supervision (by both the<br />
White women who ran the plantation household<br />
and also by the darker-complexioned enslaved<br />
people) and under much more severe work<br />
detail than were most of the (more trusted)<br />
darker-complexioned enslaved people.</p>
<p>Books by Deborah Gray White; Paula Giddings;<br />
J. California Cooper; bell hooks’, etc.<br />
expose the truth about the urban-myth and<br />
show that the lighter slaves received NO<br />
special treatment and were (as mere “mongrels<br />
of miscegenation”) usually treated much<br />
worse than were darker-complexioned slaves.</p>
<p>Hope this information is helpful<br />
&amp; that everyone has a great day. </p>
<p>– AP (soaptalk@hotmail.com)</p>
<p><!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
